Bookmark and Share

Newsletters

June 2009

JDA Aviation

Aviation Technology Solutions
June 2009
JDA Aviation

Welcome to the June issue of the JDA Aviation Technology Solutions newsletter. In this issue there are articles about the ideal structure for a safety management system (SMS), how to evaluate your safety culture, and the "green revolution."  And to keep you up-to-date regarding JDA activities, there is a list of our current and ongoing projects on the right-hand side. 

Your feedback is important to us, so if you have any thoughts on this newsletter or ideas on what you would like to see covered in the future, please send us an e-mail.  If you would like to share this newsletter with a friend, click here.


Safety Management System (SMS) Structure

The building block that unites a sound safety management system (SMS) is based on an organization's safety policy. This policy sets the company's safety principles, targets, and the corresponding organizational structure and responsibilities. Additional SMS building blocks are based on three primary processes. These processes help an organization achieve safety goals, assure safety, and improve safety.

 

Achieving Safety
Safety goals are achieved by developing changes in processes, assessing the safety impact of the resulting situation, and mitigating risks to an acceptable level. Process changes need to be suitably documented and employees and staff trained to handle new situations.

Assuring Safety
Safety is assured by analyzing the safety performance of the operation. Events need to be reported and investigated and the resultant statistics monitored. When safety elements tend to develop adversely, adjustments need to be taken. Safety is improved by learning from experience. An organization can disseminate lessons learned via safety bulletins, newsletters, and other safety promotion forums. In addition, staff can be given the opportunity to report concerns regarding safety in a confidential manner.

Improving Safety
An organization's embedded safety culture that encourages and enables open reporting is crucial for continuous improvement. Other features of a solid SMS can be attributed to human factors training programs, manuals and other guidelines, supporting tools, and the integration of security issues.

Tools
One way to facilitate a successful SMS is to take advantage of existing applications or tools that have been created specifically for SMS.
SMS Pro™, a Web-based SMS tool is designed around the ICAO SMS requirements and FAA SMS pillars. It enables organizations to roll out an SMS on a phased implementation schedule. To learn more about SMS Pro™ go to
www.aviation-sms.com.


Ten Truths about the "Green Revolution"

1) Creating clean energy solutions and dealing with environmental issues is good for business.

2) Ideas that are good for the earth may also be a good source of energy for people.

3) For various reasons, Gen X, Y and Z are motivated to make a difference.

4) We are better able to understand our impact on the earth and to communicate with each other to solve problems.

5) People generally agree that the debate is over about our impact on the earth. As technology quantifies the impact, motivated people will step up to make the difference.

6) There are many sub sectors within the green community, and people have different experiences and perspectives. Examples include energy generation, bio fuels, wind, efficiency, building design and smart lighting for buildings.

7) Environmental collaboration is taking place across organizations, geographic locations and governments.

8) Collaboration, technology development and leadership cannot succeed without the involvement of policy makers.

9) Sustainable business leadership will involve the right people to ensure academia, business, policy, industry sectors and other leaders remain engaged.

10) Businesses are leading the way, not extremists, for all the reasons listed above.


What is the Safety Culture of Your Company?
Going "Undercover" to Discover What You Don't Know

Employee surveys, brown bag lunches, focus groups, and informal chats are some methods used by managers to find out what their staff is thinking. Often the results are mixed at best. What is your staff thinking? Admit it—you don't really know.

Is there any way of finding out? Electronic surveillance is a bad idea. One chief executive, Mr. Martin of a UK-based manufacturing firm, did the next best thing. He went undercover in his own business for two weeks, disguised as an office worker, completing shifts on 10 different sites. He heard for himself what his people really think. And it was a revelatory experience. They said things to him that they would never have told their managers. Key messages were just not getting through to people.

This "experiment" highlighted a classic management problem. Leaders may know exactly what they want to see happening. They send messages down the management line that employees ought to understand. But somewhere between top management and the shop, something goes wrong. Leadership teams can be scarily ignorant of how badly their wishes have been distorted, and how much unhappiness there is among those on the receiving end.

So let's spin Mr. Martin's experiment as it relates to the safety culture of an air carrier, repair station or any other certificated aviation organization: your organization. How many times have we read or heard senior management say, "We have a very strong safety culture"? Well that line has been used very often and as recently as right after the last major U.S. commercial aircraft accident. The fact is, like it or not, most aviation organizations that espouse having a strong safety culture really don't know. They may turn to their internal databases and show no major events or mishaps in the last 10 years, but that alone, is not an indicator of a strong safety culture.

Getting Started
In order to get to your desired end state, you have to know your starting point. This means you have to conduct a baseline survey to determine your safety culture norms. This can be done in-house, but to gain credibility with your workforce and a non-biased, expert analysis; it is strongly recommended that you bring in an outside consulting group.

What to Measure
You should measure employee and manager perceptions of safety cultural factors that correlate with three safety performance areas:
  1. Organizational factors
  2.
Team factors
  3.
Safety-specific factors

Expectation
A safety culture assessment has to be viewed as a diagnostic tool, not a survey. The assessment will help identify indicators and areas for improvement, including factors that predict an organization's ability to achieve safety performance excellence as well as other metrics important to the organization.

Results
If properly managed, your assessment results should provide indicators that will help you:

  1. Determine and examine management practices, systems and cultural issues that influence safety.
  2. Improve your understanding of your current safety culture relative to the culture needed for safety excellence.
  3. Ensure that you are focusing on the right areas to improve your safety culture and performance.

Hopefully you won't have to go undercover like Mr. Martin did to understand your safety culture. If you decide to pursue a safety culture assessment, communicate what you plan to do with your employees and encourage their full and honest participation. Once you get your assessment results, you will have a great starting point for resetting your safety culture and moving on to implementing a Safety Management System.

 

 

In This Issue:

-Safety Management System (SMS) Structure
-Ten Truths about the "Green Revolution" 
-What is the Safety Culture of your Company?
-Current JDA Projects

JDA Aviation Technology Solutions
www.jdasolutions.aero 
877-532-2376

Current JDA Projects:

Airspace and obstruction evaluation services for 18 building and tower development firms.

Airspace and surveillance impact analysis for Reagan National Airport (DCA) in support of the Arlington County redevelopment plan.

Developing airport obstacle clearance standards in accordance with AC 150/5300-13 Airport Design Standards for two firms proposing development projects adjacent to airports.

New Part 121 Operating Certificate and associated operating manuals
for a Part 135 operator.

New Part 145 Operating Certificate and associated manuals for
avionics maintenance facility.

Obstacle evaluation (Part 77 and TERPS) surface development for Jack Edwards Airport, Gulf Shores, Alabama.

Operations, Safety, Maintenance and Culture Assessment and Survey
for a Part 121 operator.

RNAV procedure design and validation in support of airspace mitigation efforts in Tampa, Florida.

Site planning and airspace analysis for a major wind turbine development firm.

Supporting three law firms in aviation litigation management.