Newsletters
June 2010
Aviation Technology Solutions |
June 2010 Newsletter |
![]() | |
Sixty-five to seventy percent of aviation incidents and accidents, where maintenance is a causal factor, are due to failure to follow written and approved policies and procedures. In many cases, failure to comply with written and approved instructions can put the certificated mechanic and the operator in a regulatory non-compliance situation that could be costly to both. Usually knowledge of the regulatory non-compliance event does not surface until after the event takes place. One of the best ways to pinpoint deficiencies in a maintenance program is to have an effective and active audit program in place. A good audit program is one that provides continuous audit/review of the entire maintenance program to ensure that everyone at all levels meets all applicable regulations, OEM policies and procedures, instructions for continued airworthiness as well as company procedures and industry standards. Do not forget your responsibility for contract vendors and suppliers. An audit program should address the following as a minimum.
Business aircraft are expensive to own and operate. Under 14 CFR 91, there are opportunities for sharing aircraft expenses; however, these opportunities are very limited. One consideration is for the Part 91 operator to obtain a Part 135 certificate. One benefit of obtaining a Part 135 certificate is the ability to receive compensation from anyone for use of a company aircraft. Rather than being limited to payment from corporate affiliates or sharply limited compensation, under Part 135 an aircraft operator can receive compensation limited only by the market and competition. Under Part 91 a corporate executive can only reimburse his company for certain limited direct expenses. Many executives choose to treat personal flights as a taxable fringe benefit. As a result, the IRS gets more taxes and the company gets nothing for the use of the airplane. However, if the company airplane is flown under Part 135, the executive is free to reimburse for the full cost of any personal flights. Another benefit of operating under Part 135 is liability protection for company assets. To protect these assets, attorneys often recommend placing the company airplane(s) and associated personnel in a separate subsidiary corporate entity with no other business, such as ABC Jets, LLC. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) does not allow the subsidiary corporation to operate flights under Part 91 if it receives any compensation for those flights, even from the parent company. However, if the subsidiary holds a Part 135 certificate, the flights would be legal and the assets of the corporation protected. Most states have some sales or use tax that applies to the purchase or use of an aircraft by a state resident. As a result, the purchase of an expensive jet may result in a significant tax bill from the state. On the other hand, many states provide an exemption from the tax for aircraft that operate under Part 135. The specifics regarding these tax exemptions vary from state to state and the conditions for meeting the exemption must be precisely followed to preserve the exemption. However, if an exemption is available, operating under Part 135 instead of Part 91 could mean significant tax savings. Operating third party charters with the company airplane under Part 135 may also enhance the opportunity to deduct the aircraft ownership and operating expenses as a business expense. In addition, Part 135 may be "safer" than Part 91 because of the additional safety requirements imposed by regulations as well as the FAA oversight. Despite the advantages of operating under Part 135, obtaining a Part 135 certificate does come at some expense. There is the time and expense required to obtain an FAA 135 certificate. Part of this certification process involves development of company operating, training, and maintenance manuals that will strictly govern your operations. Once certification is obtained there may be increased FAA scrutiny. Your operations will be subject to certain restrictions. Some airports you could use under Part 91 may no longer be available because of runway length restrictions. You may be limited to airports with on-field weather reporting. Your pilots will now have to adhere to limits on flight and duty time. Some may say these "disadvantages" will result in a safer operation. The company will have to balance the advantages of operating under Part 135 against the cost and restrictions involved. One option for corporate operators to consider to avoid the time and expense associated with obtaining their own Part 135 certificate is to place their airplane and crew on another 135 certificate. Your airplane can then be operated under Part 135 when advantageous and under Part 91 at other times. However there are fees, costs and revenue sharing that you must take into account as well as ensuring operational control requirements are met, which may limit the benefits of placing your aircraft and crew on another Part 135 certificate. The decision to move to Part 135 is a significant one. To help corporate operators in this regard JDA developed 135 Pro™, which is designed to provide a simplified and low cost way to obtain a Part 135 certificate and be in full compliance with FAA requirements. 135 Pro™ includes:
JDA has announced the dates and location for its next one-of-a-kind regulatory affairs training course! The course will be held September 14-15 at JDA's headquarters in Bethesda, MD. JDA's former career FAA Managers and Principal Inspectors will provide training on FAA Flight Standards processes and operating methods, investigating and responding to FAA inquiries and recommendations on how to implement procedures for interfacing with the FAA including:
One participant described the course as "One of the best training courses I ever attended. I learned more in two days about the FAA and the oversight process than I have during my seven years on the job. The course is jam packed with valuable information." For detailed course and registration information, go to www.jdasolutions.aero/services/regulatory-training.php or contact Michael Kushner at 301-941-1460 ext.130 or via email at mkushner@jdasolutions.aero. |
Current JDA Projects:
Airspace and obstruction evaluation services for 18 building and tower development firms.
Airspace and surveillance impact analysis for Reagan National Airport (DCA) in support of the Arlington County redevelopment plan.
Assisting a corporate business operator obtain a Part 135 operating certificate.
Contracted by Dezer properties of Sunny Isles Beach, Florida to support a new building project to determine if the new building will be a potential hazard for aviation per 14 CFR Part 77.
Contracted by Prismatic Development to assist with FAA determination of no hazard approval for the installation of a 195-foot construction crane across the water from the end of Runway 13 at LaGuardia (LGA) Airport, New York.
Contracted by Spectrum Surveying and Engineering Company, Las Vegas, NV to support them with an FAA determination of no hazard for construction of a building in Las Vegas.
Developing airport obstacle clearance standards in accordance with AC 150/5300-13 Airport Design Standards for two firms proposing development projects adjacent to airports.
New Part 121 Operating Certificate and associated operating manuals for a Part 135 operator.
Obstacle evaluation (Part 77 and TERPS) surface development for Jack Edwards Airport, Gulf Shores, Alabama.
Providing Technical support to a Washington, DC based law firm and a New York based law firm pertaining to pending legal cases.
RNAV procedure design and validation in support of airspace mitigation efforts in Tampa, Florida.
Site planning and airspace analysis for a major wind turbine development firm.
Supporting the airspace safety analysis pertaining to the installation of a power transmission line for Power Engineers.
|
|||||
